Collectively, these thirteen countries demonstrate the diversity of approaches to residency and citizenship by investment. From the ultra-exclusive U.S. program demanding millions of dollars, to the relatively affordable Caribbean citizenship options, the market caters to different budgets and motivations. Critics argue that such schemes can create inequalities, drive up local real estate prices, and compromise the meaning of citizenship. Supporters counter that they generate vital revenue, attract talent, and strengthen economic resilience. What is clear is that Golden Visas and Citizenship by Investment programs are not disappearing anytime soon; in fact, they are becoming increasingly sophisticated. As global uncertainty continues to drive demand for mobility and security, these programs will remain an important feature of international migration policy.
