
A major limitation of history books is that they are ultimately interpreters of events, and interpretation is always vulnerable to the biases and perspectives of the author, regardless of their scholarly rigor. The language used—whether formal, critical, or sympathetic—inevitably frames the reader's understanding. The photograph, however, forces the viewer to become the primary interpreter; the image presents the raw scenario, and the viewer must construct the narrative, leading to a more active and, arguably, clearer intellectual engagement with the historical fact.